Analysis of the efficacy of Active and passive drainage after modified radical mastectomy

Authors

  • Prem Sagar Choudhary Senior Resident,Department of Surgery ,Vardhman Institute of Medical Sciences, Pawapuri, Nalanda, India
  • Sanghmitra Kumari Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Vardhman Institute of Medical Sciences, Pawapuri, Nalanda, India
  • Rajendra Singh Associate Professor, Department of Surgery ,Vardhman Institute of Medical Sciences, Pawapuri, Nalanda, India

Keywords:

Drain output, Modified radical mastectomy, Passive drains, Suction drains.

Abstract

Background: Amongst various factors that influence the amount of post operative drainage, the negative suction pressure applied to the drain has been reported to be of great significance. Aim: To analyze the amount and extent of drainage between an active and passive drainage in patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy. Methods: Patients were randomised using randomly ordered sealed envelopes, which were opened immediately before the closure of the wound, to decide on whether suction or dependent drain was to be given. Drains were removed when output was less than 30 ml per day. Patients were followed up from the day of surgery till the day of drain removal. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS.Results: There is significant increase in the drain per day in post MRM patients with active suction drain. But, there is no relation between the type of drain and either total drain output or the total number of days of drain. The study also revealed that there is no significant difference in the number of days of hospital stay in both groups of patients.Conclusion: Suction drains do not have any significant advantage over dependent drains after Modified Radical Mastectomy in breast cancer patients.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-29

How to Cite

Choudhary, P. S., Kumari, S., & Singh, R. (2020). Analysis of the efficacy of Active and passive drainage after modified radical mastectomy. International Journal of Health and Clinical Research, 3(10), 147–150. Retrieved from https://ijhcr.com/index.php/ijhcr/article/view/423